My insaaaane friend David Danzig pays $120 for a haircut. He makes a pithy argument in favor of this insanity, and I like to use the word 'pithy' here because most people don't know what it means and assume it means something quite opposite of what it does. And in fact that opposite meaning is really what I'm trying to convey, despite the fact that the actual meaning may be appropriate. But I'm not buying it.

Now I'm not saying the man doesn't need to get his haircut. This is what happens when he doesn't:

But $120? One Hundered and Twenty Dollars? For a haircut. This is a service which famously used to cost 25 cents, and that was with a shave thrown in too. Knock Knock.

Who's there?
Scissors.
Scissors who?
See zere's no raizon to be payzing vun hoondred und tventy dollars for zees haircut. Eez juzt ein haircut.